After the publication of the original article [1], the authors noticed that there was an error.
In the first paragraph of page 5, where we compare ACCLR and ACCT, the accuracy symbols have been swapped. The right sentences are: “ACCT were on average lower than ACCLR (Table 3) and more variable (Fig. 1b). This resulted in a much higher coefficient of variation for ACCT (Fig. 1c), particularly for ADG (41.06 vs. 7.79%) and OSS (37.07 vs. 10.24%).”
The related Table 3, Fig. 1 and the discussion around those results are correct.
Alexandre PA, Li Y, Hine BC, Duff CJ, Ingham AB, Porto-Neto LR, Reverter A. Bias dispersion and accuracy of genomic predictions for feedlot and carcase traits in Australian Angus steers. Genet Sel Evol. 2021;53:77. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12711-021-00673-8.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Download references
CSIRO, Agriculture and Food, Queensland Bioscience Precinct, 306 Carmody Rd., St Lucia, Brisbane, QLD, 4067, Australia
Pâmela A. Alexandre, Yutao Li, Aaron B. Ingham, Laercio R. Porto-Neto & Antonio Reverter
CSIRO, Agriculture and Food, F.D. McMaster Laboratory, Chiswick, New England Highway, Armidale, NSW, 2350, Australia
Brad C. Hine
Angus Australia, 86 Glen Innes Rd., Armidale, NSW, 2350, Australia
Christian J. Duff
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Correspondence to Antonio Reverter.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
Reprints and Permissions
Alexandre, P.A., Li, Y., Hine, B.C. et al. Correction to: Bias, dispersion, and accuracy of genomic predictions for feedlot and carcase traits in Australian Angus steers. Genet Sel Evol 53, 88 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12711-021-00677-4
Download citation
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12711-021-00677-4
Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:
Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.
Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative