Example：10.1021/acsami.1c06204 or Chem. Rev., 2007, 107, 2411-2502
A missing link in the Traditional Courts Bill 2017: Evidence obtained through human rights violations South African Crime Quarterly (IF), Pub Date : 2018-09-30, DOI: 10.17159/2413-3108/2018/v0n65a5268 Robert Doya Nanima
The issue of admission of evidence obtained through human rights violations is central to a criminal justice system as a mechanism through which to prevent overzealous prosecution by the state and ensure protection of human rights. As such, any court that deals with criminal cases has to evaluate evidence before it is admitted. This article argues that the Traditional Courts Bill (TCB)1 does not provide for a mode of dealing with evidence obtained as a result of human rights violations. To substantiate this argument, the article reviews the current Bill, and reflects on the challenges that arise with regard to evidence obtained in this way. The article contextualises section 35(5) of the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, and discusses the practical difficulties of applying it under the current Bill. The article concludes with recommendations for measures that can ensure that accused persons are not prejudiced when appearing before the court.